REMANI K. vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE . — SLP(Crl) No. 7858/2008
Case under Section II-D. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010309922008
Filing Date
23-Oct-2008
Registration No
SLP(Crl) No. 7858/2008
Diary Number
30992/2008
Order Date
25-Mar-2009
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.REMANI K.
Adv. A. RAGHUNATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE .
Adv. R. SATHISH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
05-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 7858/2008
Case Summary: SLP(Crl) No. 7858/2008 - Remani K. v. Superintendent of Police Dr. Remani K. and Chandramathy Amma S. sought anticipatory bail in connection with a Rs. 50-crore financial fraud involving two institutions (Total U and NEST). They were accused of conspiring with Sabrinath to defraud approximately 1,000 investors by promising high returns, then misappropriating funds under Sections 420, 406/34, and 120-B IPC. The Supreme Court dismissed both Special Leave Petitions, finding sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioners and holding that anticipatory bail was not warranted. However, the Court clarified that petitioners could still apply for regular bail and that its observations would not prejudice them during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts