ANUJ KUMAR SAINI vs RASHTRIYA KSHATRA SEWA DAL N.. — C.A. No. 3165/2009

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010309862007

Filing Date

24-Oct-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 3165/2009

Diary Number

30986/2007

Order Date

25-Aug-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUJ KUMAR SAINI

    Adv. PRAGATI NEEKHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RASHTRIYA KSHATRA SEWA DAL N..

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 18-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 16-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 04-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 28-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 24-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 25-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 01-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 19-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 24-Oct-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3165/2009

casestatus.in Summary

In Civil Appeal No. 3165 of 2009, the Supreme Court bench of Justices Markandey Katju and Chandramauli Kr. Prasad dismissed Anuj Kumar Saini's appeal on 25 August 2011, finding it not a fit case to exercise discretion under Article 136 of the Constitution. The respondent (Rashtriya Kshatra Sewa Dal N. & Anr.) did not appear despite being served. The Court also dismissed the application for impleadment, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case