STATE OF H.P. . vs JANKI DEVI (D) THR. LRS. — C.A. No. 3365/2012

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010307082007

Filing Date

23-Oct-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 3365/2012

Diary Number

30708/2007

Order Date

02-Apr-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF H.P. .

    Adv. HIMINDER LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JANKI DEVI (D) THR. LRS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 02-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 11-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 27-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 22-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 06-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 13-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 06-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 14-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 23-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Oct-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3365/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of H.P. v. Janki Devi (C.A. No. 3365/2012) On April 2, 2012, the Supreme Court heard the State of Himachal Pradesh's appeal against the High Court of Himachal Pradesh's judgment dated July 19, 2007. The Court granted leave to appeal but set aside the High Court's impugned judgment and remitted the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration, citing its precedent order in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sarab Dayal (Civil Appeal No. 4040/2011). The appeal was disposed with each party bearing its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case