AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS HEAD OF LAW DEPARTMENT SHRI SUNIL CHANDRASEKHAR JAGTAP vs PIMPRI CHINCHWAD VYAPARI MANDAL THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI GAJANAN BABAR — C.A. No. 8330 - 8331/2012
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010306972007
Filing Date
23-Oct-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 8330 - 8331/2012
Diary Number
30697/2007
Order Date
26-Jul-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS HEAD OF LAW DEPARTMENT SHRI SUNIL CHANDRASEKHAR JAGTAP
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.PIMPRI CHINCHWAD VYAPARI MANDAL THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI GAJANAN BABAR
Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
23-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8330 - 8331/2012
The Supreme Court disposed of the appeals on July 26, 2017, maintaining its interim order from October 31, 2007, which stayed the impugned order and entitled the Agricultural Produce Market Committee to levy market fees on scheduled articles (sugar, vanaspati, dry fruits, cashew nuts) purchased from outside but sold within the market area. The collection was made subject to the outcome of the pending writ petition in the High Court, which was requested to decide the matter within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts