P.P.KOYA @ MOHAMMED KOYA vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT — C.A. No. 6745/2008

Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010306442008

Filing Date

21-Oct-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 6745/2008

Diary Number

30644/2008

Order Date

06-Nov-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.P.KOYA @ MOHAMMED KOYA

    Adv. V. K. MONGA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Nov-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Nov-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  4. 05-Nov-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  5. 24-Oct-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  6. 23-Oct-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  7. 17-Oct-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 17-Oct-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  9. 16-Oct-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  10. 15-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 26-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Oct-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6745/2008

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 006745/2008 P.P. Koya v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Calicut The Supreme Court dismissed P.P. Koya's civil appeal on November 6, 2019. The Court found that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to reject the appellant's claim—upheld by the High Court—represented a possible view of the matter and warranted no interference. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case