THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD vs THE BLOSSAM CO-OP. HNG. BUILDG. STY.. — C.A. No. 1680/2010
Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010305382008
Filing Date
20-Oct-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 1680/2010
Diary Number
30538/2008
Order Date
16-Aug-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD
Adv. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE BLOSSAM CO-OP. HNG. BUILDG. STY..
Adv. KAMALDEEP GULATI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant
-
09-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
23-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Oct-2009
ROPView PDF
-
21-Aug-2009
ROPView PDF
-
15-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
28-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
30-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
27-Feb-2009
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1680/2010
-
13-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters
Lead case: C.A. No. 1674/2010
Case Summary C.A. No. 001680/2010: Union Territory of Chandigarh v. Blossam Co-op Housing Building Society On 04/07/2013, the Supreme Court Registrar heard the appeal. The Chandigarh Housing Board's counsel filed a statement of case, but respondent No.1 failed to file their statement. The Court directed the matter be relisted before the Judge with an office report noting the respondents' default and referencing a prior order dated 2.3.2013 from the Judge in Chambers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts