HARI SINGH (D) TR.LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE vs CHANDER PRAKASH . — Crl.A. No. 1826/2010

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010305062006

Filing Date

22-Nov-2006

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 1826/2010

Diary Number

30506/2006

Order Date

21-Sep-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI SINGH (D) TR.LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

    Adv. PREM MALHOTRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER PRAKASH .

    Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 15-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 16-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 03-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 31-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 27-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 31-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 17-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 12-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 31-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 22-Nov-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1826/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 1826/2010 On 21 September 2010, the Supreme Court heard the appeal filed by Hari Singh's legal representative against Chander Prakash and others regarding a Section 494 IPC conviction case. The Trial Court had convicted respondents 1-4, but the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat reversed the conviction, which was upheld by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana. The Supreme Court, finding no merit in the appeal, dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case