C.I.T BOMBAY vs TASGAON TALUKA S.S.K.LTD. — C.A. No. 8890/2012

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010303952010

Filing Date

24-Sep-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 8890/2012

Diary Number

30395/2010

Order Date

05-Mar-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 309

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.I.T BOMBAY

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TASGAON TALUKA S.S.K.LTD.

    Adv. B. K. PAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Mar-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-Mar-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  5. 05-Mar-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  6. 16-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  8. 10-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  9. 09-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Oct-2016

    ROPView PDF

  11. 17-Oct-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  12. 17-Oct-2016

    ROPView PDF

  13. 22-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  16. 13-Jul-2016

    ROPView PDF

  17. 06-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 29-Apr-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 18-Apr-2016

    ROPView PDF

  21. 18-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  22. 18-Apr-2016

    ROPView PDF

  23. 25-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  24. 25-Feb-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  25. 25-Feb-2016

    ROPView PDF

  26. 08-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 30-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 30-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 27-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 27-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 04-Sep-2014

    ROPView PDF

  32. 04-Sep-2014

    ROPView PDF

  33. 03-Sep-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  34. 18-Jul-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  35. 18-Jul-2014

    ROPView PDF

  36. 01-Jul-2014

    ROPView PDF

  37. 17-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  38. 11-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  39. 04-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  40. 28-Mar-2014

    ROPView PDF

  41. 27-Mar-2014

    ROPView PDF

  42. 13-Mar-2014

    ROPView PDF

  43. 07-Mar-2014

    ROPView PDF

  44. 26-Feb-2014

    ROPView PDF

  45. 20-Jan-2014

    ROPView PDF

  46. 02-Dec-2013

    ROPView PDF

  47. 01-Nov-2013

    ROPView PDF

  48. 17-Oct-2013

    ROPView PDF

  49. 08-Oct-2013

    ROPView PDF

  50. 12-Sep-2013

    ROPView PDF

  51. 09-Sep-2013

    ROPView PDF

  52. 05-Aug-2013

    Office ReportView PDF

  53. 05-Aug-2013

    ROPView PDF

  54. 24-Jul-2013

    ROPView PDF

  55. 15-Jul-2013

    ROPView PDF

  56. 03-May-2013

    ROPView PDF

  57. 26-Apr-2013

    ROPView PDF

  58. 11-Mar-2013

    ROPView PDF

  59. 12-Feb-2013

    ROPView PDF

  60. 12-Feb-2013

    ROPView PDF

  61. 14-Jan-2013

    ROPView PDF

  62. 09-Jan-2013

    ROPView PDF

  63. 07-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 23-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  65. 30-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  66. 08-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  67. 17-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  68. 14-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  69. 05-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  70. 03-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  71. 04-May-2012

    ROPView PDF

  72. 17-Apr-2012

    ROPView PDF

  73. 28-Feb-2012

    ROPView PDF

  74. 08-Feb-2012

    ROPView PDF

  75. 31-Jan-2012

    ROPView PDF

  76. 30-Jan-2012

    ROPView PDF

  77. 02-Jan-2012

    ROPView PDF

  78. 05-Dec-2011

    ROPView PDF

  79. 22-Nov-2011

    ROPView PDF

  80. 11-Nov-2011

    ROPView PDF

  81. 03-Nov-2011

    ROPView PDF

  82. 21-Sep-2011

    ROPView PDF

  83. 15-Sep-2011

    ROPView PDF

  84. 24-Aug-2011

    ROPView PDF

  85. 24-Aug-2011

    ROPView PDF

  86. 28-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  87. 21-Jan-2011

    ROPView PDF

  88. 15-Dec-2010

    ROPView PDF

  89. 12-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  90. 22-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  91. 24-Sep-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8890/2012

  92. 16-Nov-2009

    ROPView PDF

  93. 06-Oct-2009

    ROPView PDF

  94. 24-Aug-2009

    ROPView PDF

  95. 09-Jul-2009

    ROPView PDF

  96. 27-Feb-2009

    ROPView PDF

  97. 05-Jan-2009

    ROPView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.I.T. Bombay v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. The Supreme Court held that while the difference between Statutory Minimum Price (SMP) under Clause 3 and State Advisory Price (SAP) under Clause 5A of the Sugar Cane Control Order, 1966 contains a profit element, the entire difference cannot automatically be treated as profit appropriation. Assessing officers must examine accounts and materials supplied to determine the actual profit component, which is disallowable, while treating the remaining amount as deductible expenditure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case