SEENAPPA vs R. KRISHNAPPA (DEAD) BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 7293/2016

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010299212009

Filing Date

01-Oct-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 7293/2016

Diary Number

29921/2009

Order Date

09-Mar-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SEENAPPA

    Adv. G. BALAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R. KRISHNAPPA (DEAD) BY LRS. .

    Adv. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Mar-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  4. 04-Mar-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Mar-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  6. 03-Mar-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  7. 02-Mar-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  8. 23-Feb-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  9. 10-Feb-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 10-Feb-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  11. 09-Feb-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  12. 04-Feb-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai

  13. 03-Feb-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  14. 02-Feb-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  15. 28-Jan-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  16. 27-Jan-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  17. 21-Jan-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  18. 20-Jan-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  19. 10-Dec-2020

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai

  20. 08-Dec-2020

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai

  21. 02-Dec-2020

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  22. 05-Mar-2020

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  23. 04-Mar-2020

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari

  24. 28-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 03-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 03-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 02-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 02-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 07-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 07-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 12-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 01-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 21-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 21-Nov-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 11-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 03-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 28-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 01-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 26-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 16-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 20-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 30-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 16-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 12-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 23-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 27-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 15-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 10-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 17-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 15-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 28-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 29-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 25-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 18-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 01-Oct-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7293/2016

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Civil Appeal No. 7293/2016 (Seenappa v. R. Krishnappa) The Supreme Court dismissed Seenappa's appeal challenging the lower courts' findings on a disputed 1981 document. The High Court had remanded the matter to determine whether the document constituted a valid gift deed, partition deed, or sale. On remand, Seenappa failed to amend his written statement to properly plead compliance with gift deed requirements under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and failed to produce sufficient evidence, including attesting witnesses. Both Trial and Appellate Courts concurrently found Seenappa unable to prove the document was a valid gift deed. The Supreme Court upheld this concurrent factual finding, holding Seenappa's failure to discharge essential pleading obligations was itself sufficient grounds for dismissal. No order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case