AUTHORISED OFFICER,LAND REFORMS TRIBUNAL vs KOKA RAMADASAPPA (D) THR.LRS. — C.A. No. 6376 - 6377/2010
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010299062008
Filing Date
13-Oct-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 6376 - 6377/2010
Diary Number
29906/2008
Order Date
04-Dec-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AUTHORISED OFFICER,LAND REFORMS TRIBUNAL
Adv. G. N. REDDY[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.KOKA RAMADASAPPA (D) THR.LRS.
Adv. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Dec-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Dec-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
03-Dec-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
28-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
27-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
26-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
19-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
14-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
05-Nov-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6376 - 6377/2010
Summary of C.A. No. 006376-006377/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed the Authorised Officer's appeals challenging the High Court's order upholding the Land Reforms Tribunal's direction to pay Rs. 1,08,074 compensation (for 88.57 acres of surplus land acquired) plus 12% per annum interest. The Court held that though the 1973 Act and 1974 Rules don't explicitly provide for interest, precedent established landowners are entitled to interest for the time between land vesting and compensation payment. No interference warranted; appeals dismissed with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts