U.P. FOREST CORPORATION vs APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972/ UPPER LABOUR COMMISSIONER — SLP(C) No. 22310/2026

Case under Labour and Industrial Laws : Payment of Wages, Bonus, Provident Fund, Gratuity, Service Benefits, Benefits Under Esic Act, 1948, Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (Now Employees Compensation Act, 1923)and Payment of Overtime Wages and Minimum Wage. Section XI. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010293422026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 22310/2026

Diary Number

29342/2026

Order Date

18-Jun-2026

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Labour and Industrial Laws : Payment of wages, bonus, provident fund, gratuity, service benefits, benefits under ESIC Act, 1948, compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (now Employees Compensation Act, 1923)and payment of overtime wages and minimum wage. Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.U.P. FOREST CORPORATION

    Adv. RAJAT JOSEPH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APPELLATE AUTHORITY, PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972/ UPPER LABOUR COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026
  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

  3. 16-Jun-2026
  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 22310/2026

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 564/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In SLP(C) No. 022310/2026, the Supreme Court heard U.P. Forest Corporation's petition challenging a High Court order regarding gratuity payment obligations under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court condoned the delay in filing and issued notice on the substantial question of law, directing the petition to be tagged with Civil Appeal No. 564 of 2020 for consolidated hearing. The petitioner stated that gratuity had already been disbursed per the impugned order, and now seeks relief on the legal question involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case