CHHATTISGARH ENVIRON.CONSERV.BOARD vs GOVT.OF A.P. . — T.P.(C) No. 1159/2008
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010292242008
Filing Date
04-Oct-2008
Registration No
T.P.(C) No. 1159/2008
Diary Number
29224/2008
Order Date
27-Feb-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHATTISGARH ENVIRON.CONSERV.BOARD
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVT.OF A.P. .
Adv. SHREEKANT NEELAPPA TERDAL Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO NIKHIL NAYYAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RUTWIK PANDA SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE ANITHA SHENOY (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 1159/2008
Summary of T.P.(C) No. 001159/2008 On 27 February 2013, the Supreme Court allowed the Transfer Petition filed by Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board. The Court directed that W.P. No. 27787/2007 (Government of A.P. vs. National Environment Appellate Authority & Others) pending in the Andhra Pradesh High Court be transferred to the Supreme Court and consolidated with I.A. Nos. 1572 and 1578 in W.P.(C) No. 202/1995. The respondent state consented to the transfer, and case records were directed to be transmitted without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts