RABINDRA NATH vs BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD . — SLP(C) No. 29041/2008

Case under Section COMPUTER CELL. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010290632008

Filing Date

03-Oct-2008

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 29041/2008

Diary Number

29063/2008

Order Date

31-Jul-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section COMPUTER CELL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABINDRA NATH

    Adv. SUBHRO SANYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD .

    Adv. MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 30-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 23-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 25-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 30-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 03-Oct-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 29041/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Rabindra Nath, a Scheduled Caste candidate, challenged his non-selection for Assistant Executive Engineer (Telecom) after scoring only 22.25 marks against the required 78.75 marks. The Patna High Court's Division Bench ordered a re-examination, but the Supreme Court dismissed his special leave petition on 31/07/2013, finding no merit. The Court rejected his argument that being called for interview implied he passed the written exam, noting that the Board's reply showed all candidates were interviewed regardless of written exam performance, and he failed to produce evidence of qualifying. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case