KAPIL KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB . — SLP(Crl) No. 7673/2008

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010289492008

Filing Date

03-Oct-2008

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 7673/2008

Diary Number

28949/2008

Order Date

18-Nov-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAPIL KUMAR

    Adv. R. NEDUMARAN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB .

    Adv. J S WAD AND CO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 06-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 03-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Jan-2009
  14. 16-Jan-2009
  15. 18-Dec-2008
  16. 01-Dec-2008
  17. 03-Oct-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 7673/2008

  18. 04-Aug-2008
  19. 07-Jul-2008
  20. 06-May-2008
  21. 03-Apr-2008
  22. 10-Mar-2008
  23. 03-Mar-2008
  24. 03-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 19-Feb-2008
  26. 15-Feb-2008
  27. 30-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 16-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 13-Dec-2007
  30. 26-Nov-2007
  31. 16-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 10-Aug-2007
  33. 23-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(Crl) No. 7673/2008 - Kapil Kumar v. State of Punjab On 18 November 2010, the Supreme Court dismissed Kapil Kumar's Special Leave Petition challenging the High Court's order that refused to quash the FIR and criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. The Court found no merit in the petition, upholding the High Court's decision. However, the Court clarified that any observations or findings made by the High Court shall not prejudice the petitioner during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case