DAMODAR VALLEY CORP. AND ANR. vs RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS — C.A. No. 6878 - 6879/2008
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010288592008
Filing Date
01-Oct-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 6878 - 6879/2008
Diary Number
28859/2008
Order Date
14-Jul-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DAMODAR VALLEY CORP. AND ANR.
Adv. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
Adv. RITESH AGRAWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Jul-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
18-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
-
17-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
-
16-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
-
10-Mar-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
-
23-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6878 - 6879/2008
Case Summary: C.A. No. 006878-006879/2008 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Damodar Valley Corporation as infructuous on 14 July 2021. The case concerned an IPS Officer (Respondent No.1) on deputation with the Corporation; the High Court had directed his repatriation to his parent cadre, but the Supreme Court stayed this judgment in November 2008. Since then, the officer was promoted in his parent cadre and informed the Court he no longer wished to work on deputation with the Corporation, rendering the dispute moot. All pending applications were disposed of, though the underlying legal questions were kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts