CHANDER DEV vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH DISTRICT COLLECTOR — C.A. No. 6887/2008
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010287932007
Filing Date
03-Oct-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 6887/2008
Diary Number
28793/2007
Order Date
01-Nov-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 02-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDER DEV
Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA E. C. AGRAWALA[P-2] E. C. AGRAWALA[P-3]
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH DISTRICT COLLECTOR
Adv. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
03-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
11-Jan-2017
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2013
ROPView PDF
-
06-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2009
ROPView PDF
-
27-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
25-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6887/2008
On November 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of India dismissed Civil Appeal No. 6887/2008 filed by Chander Dev and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh, along with the related appeal CA No. 2665/2009. The two-judge bench of Justices S.A. Bobde and L. Nageswara Rao found the appeals devoid of merit and dismissed them accordingly. No further directions or next steps were specified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts