FAINUL KHAN vs STATE OF JHARKHAND . — Crl.A. No. 937/2011
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010283932009
Filing Date
16-Sep-2009
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 937/2011
Diary Number
28393/2009
Order Date
04-Oct-2019
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 1127
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FAINUL KHAN
Adv. SUDARSHAN RAJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND .
Adv. ANIL K. JHA ANIL K. JHA T. MAHIPAL[R-2] ANIL K. JHA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Oct-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai
-
25-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Sep-2019
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai
-
19-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Sep-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy
-
18-Sep-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee
-
17-Sep-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee
-
12-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2009
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 937/2011
-
[ 2019 INSC 1127 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeals of Fainul Khan, Sainul Khan, and Mir Shaukat, upholding their convictions under Sections 302/149 and 323/149 IPC for murder and rioting in connection with a 1983 assault incident in Jharkhand. The Court rejected their contentions regarding procedural defects in charge-framing and inadequate examination under Section 313 CrPC, finding no prejudice to the appellants based on credible eyewitness testimony from injured witnesses and finding sufficient evidence of their participation in an unlawful assembly with a common object. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts