GULAM WAHID vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 524/2010

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010283782009

Filing Date

16-Sep-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 524/2010

Diary Number

28378/2009

Order Date

07-Jul-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GULAM WAHID

    Adv. AFTAB ALI KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Jul-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Jul-2022

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee and Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari

  4. 13-Feb-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  5. 30-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  6. 17-Jan-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee

  7. 10-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 28-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 28-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 02-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 16-Sep-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 524/2010

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gulam Wahid v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Crl.A. 524/2010) On July 7, 2022, the Supreme Court dismissed Gulam Wahid's criminal appeal as infructuous. The State informed the court that the appellant had been released on February 15, 2014, after completing his sentence. Since the appellant had not contacted his counsel and the sentence had already been served, the court found the appeal had become moot and dismissed it accordingly. All pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case