MADHYA BHARAT GRAMIN BANK vs PANCHAMLAL YADAV — C.A. No. 9792/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010283042008

Filing Date

26-Sep-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 9792/2010

Diary Number

28304/2008

Order Date

13-Jul-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHYA BHARAT GRAMIN BANK

    Adv. SANJAY KAPUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PANCHAMLAL YADAV

    Adv. R. D. UPADHYAY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PRACHI BAJPAI[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jul-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Jul-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  4. 08-Jul-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  5. 07-Jul-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  6. 06-Jul-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  7. 20-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  8. 15-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  9. 13-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  10. 08-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  11. 07-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  12. 06-Apr-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  13. 25-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  14. 24-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  15. 23-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  16. 18-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  17. 17-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  18. 16-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  19. 10-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  20. 09-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  21. 04-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  22. 02-Mar-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  23. 23-Feb-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  24. 18-Feb-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat

  25. 17-Feb-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 26-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 26-Apr-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 26-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 19-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 16-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 20-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 27-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 20-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 26-Sep-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9792/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA No. 009792/2010 - Madhya Bharat Gramin Bank v. Panchamlal Yadav The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's order for reinstatement and directed Madhya Bharat Gramin Bank to pay compensation of Rs. 5 Lakhs to respondent Panchamlal Yadav within eight weeks. The Court held that violation of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not automatically entail reinstatement with full back wages; relief depends on individual case facts. The appeal was disposed of on July 13, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case