RAM KISHORE PRASAD vs STATE OF JHARKHAND . — Crl.A. No. 1250/2013
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010278222008
Filing Date
23-Sep-2008
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1250/2013
Diary Number
27822/2008
Order Date
23-Aug-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM KISHORE PRASAD
Adv. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND .
Adv. LAWYER S KNIT & CO ANIL K. JHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2008
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1250/2013
Case Summary: Ram Kishore Prasad v. State of Jharkhand Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order quashing the criminal prosecution, and remanded the matter to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro Steel City for fresh consideration of the prosecution report regarding non-compliance with a Labour Court Award. Background & Key Issue: The case involved a 1994 Labour Court Award in appellant's favour that allegedly remained unexecuted. A prosecution was filed under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for non-compliance. The High Court had quashed the prosecution, reasoning the Magistrate took cognizance mechanically under the wrong section. The Supreme Court disagreed, finding the High Court should have remanded rather than quashed entirely. Next Steps: The Chief Judicial Magistrate must apply fresh mind to all materials and prosecution report, hear all parties, and decide whether prosecution should proceed against the respondent-management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts