COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs M/S. JANNHAVI INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. — C.A. No. 9618/2010
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010278122008
Filing Date
23-Sep-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 9618/2010
Diary Number
27812/2008
Order Date
16-Sep-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed as withdrawn
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1
Adv. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. JANNHAVI INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD.
Adv. ARUNA GUPTA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Sep-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh
-
11-Sep-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2019
Administrative Order
Registrar (J) - II
-
18-Sep-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2018
Vacation Matter
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
04-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
16-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9618/2010
On 16 September 2021, the Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 9618/2010 (along with C.A. No. 9619/2010) as withdrawn. The Commissioner of Income Tax's counsel represented that the matters fell within the category of low tax effect and sought withdrawal of the appeals, which the Court granted. No further proceedings or next steps were indicated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts