THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE vs SAHABSINGH . — Crl.A. No. 676/2011
Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010276722010
Filing Date
31-Aug-2010
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 676/2011
Diary Number
27672/2010
Order Date
19-Apr-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE
Adv. GOPAL JHA[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHABSINGH .
Adv. RAJESH[R-11] RAJESH[R-10] RAJESH[R-9] RAJESH[R-8] RAJESH[R-7] RAJESH[R-6] RAJESH[R-5] RAJESH[R-4] RAJESH[R-3] RAJESH[R-2] RAJESH[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Apr-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Apr-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
12-Apr-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
23-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
22-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
16-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
15-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
02-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar
-
01-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar
-
23-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Mar-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2010
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 676/2011
Case Summary: Crl.A. No. 676/2011 Outcome: Supreme Court dismissed Madhya Pradesh's appeal on April 19, 2023, upholding the High Court's partial acquittals and conviction modifications. The Court found no infirmity with the High Court's reasoning that six accused (Laxman, Ramkishan, Jagdish, Sirnam, Prahlad, Halke) should be acquitted due to inconsistencies between injuries and weapons allegedly used. For five remaining accused, the Court upheld the High Court's modification of convictions from murder (Section 302) to culpable homicide (Section 304 Part I IPC), citing lack of premeditation, previous enmity, and no repeated blows on the deceased. Next Steps: All pending applications stand closed; the case is concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts