AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TH ITS CHAIRMAN vs M/S SHEIKHEIN INTERNATIONAL . — C.A. No. 5350/2009

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010275812007

Filing Date

21-Sep-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 5350/2009

Diary Number

27581/2007

Order Date

24-Jul-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TH ITS CHAIRMAN

    Adv. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHEIKHEIN INTERNATIONAL .

    Adv. SATYENDRA KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Jul-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi

  3. 23-Jul-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 12-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 16-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 04-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 28-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 22-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 01-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 03-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 07-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 21-Sep-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5350/2009

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 5349/2009

casestatus.in Summary

On 12/04/2012, in Civil Appeal No. 5350/2009 between Agra Development Authority and M/S Sheikhein International, the Supreme Court Registrar ordered that service of notice was complete and both parties had filed their statements of case. The Court directed that the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Court for substantive hearing as per procedural rules, finding no further steps necessary at the Registrar stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case