REGIONAL MANAGER, U.P.S.R.T.C.. vs MASLAHUDDIN (DEAD) — C.A. No. 3959/2019

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010273422008

Filing Date

18-Sep-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 3959/2019

Diary Number

27342/2008

Order Date

16-Apr-2019

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2019 INSC 533

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REGIONAL MANAGER, U.P.S.R.T.C..

    Adv. GARIMA PRASHAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MASLAHUDDIN (DEAD)

    Adv. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2019

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Apr-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  5. 29-Mar-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 29-Mar-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  7. 25-Feb-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  9. 25-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 25-Jan-2019

    Administrative Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  11. 05-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Mar-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul

  13. 11-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 11-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 25-Nov-2016
  16. 25-Nov-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  17. 25-Nov-2016
  18. 03-Oct-2016
  19. 03-Oct-2016
  20. 05-Apr-2016
  21. 05-Apr-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  22. 05-Apr-2016
  23. 30-Nov-2015
  24. 30-Nov-2015
  25. 17-Nov-2015
  26. 17-Nov-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  27. 17-Nov-2015
  28. 29-Jul-2015
  29. 29-Jul-2015
  30. 28-Jul-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  31. 30-Jul-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 30-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 07-Mar-2014
  34. 17-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 12-Aug-2013
  36. 03-Sep-2012
  37. 21-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 26-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 22-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 22-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 14-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 30-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 08-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 14-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 03-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 26-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 13-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 03-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 18-Sep-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3959/2019

  51. [ 2019 INSC 533 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Supreme Court allowed U.P. State Road Transport Corporation's appeals and reversed the High Court's decision, holding that bus drivers appointed in 1979 should retire at age 58 (not 60). Although initially classified as Group "D" employees with lower pay scales, their pay was retrospectively revised to Group "C" standards in 1982 with arrears paid; having accepted these revised benefits, drivers could not claim original Group "D" retirement age of 60 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case