UNION OF INDIA . vs L.G. GAUTHAM — SLP(C) No. 1983/2006

Case under Section IV-C. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010273332005

Filing Date

07-Dec-2005

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 1983/2006

Diary Number

27333/2005

Order Date

30-Jul-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA .

    Adv. ANIL KATIYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.L.G. GAUTHAM

    Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 17-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 21-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 05-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 26-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 19-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Feb-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 17-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 17-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 03-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 07-Dec-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 1983/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 1983/2006 - Union of India v. L.G. Gautham On 30/07/2010, the Supreme Court (Justices B. Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar) heard interim applications (IA Nos. 2-3) filed in the SLP challenging a Karnataka High Court judgment dated 12/09/2005. The applications pertained to restoration and delay in filing for restoration. The Court dismissed both interim applications. No further dates or directions were mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case