SAVITA DEVI @ SAVITA DHANDA vs UNION OF INDIA — W.P.(C) No. 589/2026

Case under Bar Council, Bar Associations, Advocates, Other Professional Bodies : Enrolment, Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Action Against Advocates, Elections to Bar Councils/bar Associations, Advocate Strike Section X. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010272372026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

W.P.(C) No. 589/2026

Diary Number

27237/2026

Order Date

18-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bar Council, Bar Associations, Advocates, other professional bodies : Enrolment, professional misconduct, disciplinary action against Advocates, elections to Bar Councils/Bar Associations, Advocate strike Section X

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAVITA DEVI @ SAVITA DHANDA

    Adv. KUMUD LATA DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi

  4. 15-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 589/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of W.P.(C) No. 589/2026 - Savita Devi @ Savita Dhanda v. Union of India The Supreme Court (Chief Justice and Justice Joymalya Bagchi) heard three consolidated writ petitions concerning State Bar Council election disputes on 18-05-2026. The Court constituted two additional Election Tribunals to expeditiously adjudicate disputes: Tribunal 1 headed by Justice Deepak Gupta with Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Ms. Mahalakshmi Pavani; Tribunal 2 headed by Justice Hima Kohli with Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Ms. Kaveeta Wadia. The Bar Council of India was directed to obtain formal consent and notify these tribunals within three days. All State Bar Councils must preserve records, and aggrieved parties may submit claims before the tribunals for expeditious resolution. The writ petitions stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case