AAMIR vs SHAKEEB — Crl.A. No. 2822/2026
Case under 1511Rb-criminal Law : Criminal Matters Other Than Covered by the Aforesaid Categories(slps Arising Out of Regular Bail Applications, Suspension of Sentence.) Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010270412026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 2822/2026
Diary Number
27041/2026
Order Date
25-May-2026
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Allowed
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AAMIR
Adv. GAURAV DHINGRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAKEEB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-May-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Fresh
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2822/2026
Summary of Crl.A. No. 002822/2026 (Aamir v. Shakeeb) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed all three criminal appeals filed by de-facto complainant Aamir, setting aside the High Court's orders that had granted bail to the three convicted murderers (Shakib, Shariq, and Kasif). The Court held that the High Court erred in suspending life sentences pending appeal without strong grounds for acquittal. Case Details: The appellants were convicted of the July 2017 double murder of Arif (a local councilor) and Shadab in Meerut. Evidence showed Shakib and Kasif, then imprisoned for the Saloni Kinner Murder Case, had conspired while in jail to eliminate these prosecution witnesses. The trial court convicted all three with life imprisonment; the High Court wrongly granted bail, citing discrepancies in injury patterns. Next Steps: The three accused must surrender before the Trial Court within one week. The Court advised them to request priority hearing of their pending High Court appeals, noting they have already served over eight years imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts