MAYANK J. SHAH vs RAJU V. SHAH — SLP(C) No. 16717/2026

Case under Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to Arbitral Award, Matters Relating to Execution Under Section 36, Under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and Challenges to Arbitral Award Under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010265622026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 16717/2026

Diary Number

26562/2026

Order Date

15-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Law and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution : Challenge to arbitral award, matters relating to execution under Section 36, under Section 34/Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and challenges to arbitral award under Arbitration Act, 1940 Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAYANK J. SHAH

    Adv. DHRUV GAUTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJU V. SHAH

    Adv. SASWAT PATTNAIK [caveat]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-May-2026

    Fresh

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 16717/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 16717/2026 Mayank J. Shah v. Raju V. Shah The Supreme Court dismissed Mayank J. Shah's special leave petition challenging the High Court of Bombay's order dated 10-04-2026 (in CAP No. 409/2025). However, the Court clarified that petitioners retain the right to raise all objections against the arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. All pending interlocutory applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case