A.M.H.M.PARISHAD . vs STATE OF U.P.. — SLP(C) No. 23128 - 23129/2008

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010264922008

Filing Date

11-Sep-2008

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 23128 - 23129/2008

Diary Number

26492/2008

Order Date

06-Dec-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.M.H.M.PARISHAD .

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P..

    Adv. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MANOJ K. MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 28-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 14-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 13-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 14-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 21-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 14-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 24-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 30-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 27-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 17-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 12-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 29-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 17-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 11-Sep-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 23128 - 23129/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.M.H.M. PARISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. On 6 December 2010, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions (SLP) as infructuous, finding that the original dispute concerning an election process held before 1 January 2009 had become moot since fresh elections had already been conducted. The Court noted that all questions remain open and the petitioners retain the right to challenge the new elections through available legal remedies, uninfluenced by the dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case