MOHD.ASHRAF vs STATE OF UTTARKHAND . — SLP(C) No. 30110 - 30111/2010

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010262982010

Filing Date

19-Aug-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 30110 - 30111/2010

Diary Number

26298/2010

Order Date

04-May-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD.ASHRAF

    Adv. ANAGHA S. DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARKHAND .

    Adv. SAURABH TRIVEDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 10-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 08-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 24-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 19-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 30110 - 30111/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 030110-030111/2010 Mohd. Ashraf v. State of Uttarkhand On May 4, 2012, the Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petitions challenging the Uttarakhand High Court's rejection of a mandamus plea for compensation to victims of the Chamba communal riots (July 2, 2006). The Court found the State Government's decision to enhance compensation by 50% of the District Magistrate's damage assessment to be "essentially just" and declined further enhancement. The Court directed the District Magistrate, Tehri to disburse the additional sanctioned amount to riot victims within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case