RAJA SHARMA vs STATE OF HAYANA — SLP(Crl) No. 8176/2026

Case under Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention : Slps Arising Out of Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention Matters Before the High Court Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010262412026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 8176/2026

Diary Number

26241/2026

Order Date

20-May-2026

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention : SLPs arising out of Habeas Corpus and Preventive Detention matters before the High Court Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJA SHARMA

    Adv. VALLABHI SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HAYANA

    Adv. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-1] SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-2] SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-3] SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-May-2026

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta

  4. 06-May-2026

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 8176/2026

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Raja Sharma v. State of Haryana Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition but modified the Family Court's custody order. Custody of the 8-year-old child was transferred from the father (petitioner) to the mother (respondent No. 5), after the Court directly interacted with both parents and the child in camera. The mother must facilitate daily telephonic access (6-7 PM) to the father, and the father retains the right to approach appropriate forums for visitation rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case