PRAFFUL SHUKLA . vs GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 786/2013

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010259462010

Filing Date

17-Aug-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 786/2013

Diary Number

25946/2010

Order Date

12-Dec-2023

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2023 INSC 1061

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAFFUL SHUKLA .

    Adv. VIKAS UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARY

    Adv. NIRNIMESH DUBE PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-1] PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-2] PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-3] PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Dec-2023

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Dec-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-Dec-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  5. 06-Dec-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 06-Dec-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  7. 21-Sep-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Jul-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Jul-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  10. 04-May-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 04-May-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  12. 19-Apr-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Apr-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  14. 23-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 23-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  16. 15-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  18. 01-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 01-Mar-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  20. 22-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 22-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 25-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 25-Feb-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 25-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 18-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 02-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 04-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 10-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 05-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 08-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 29-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 08-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 13-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 13-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 07-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 31-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 20-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 17-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 786/2013

  42. [ 2023 INSC 1061 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Prafful Shukla v. Government of Madhya Pradesh The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the 1999 merger of the Adult Education Department staff with the Education Department on category-wise seniority basis. The Court upheld the High Court's decision, finding that cadre merger is a legitimate policy matter and that the merged posts carried identical responsibilities and equalized pay scales from 1996. The Court noted that only 17 of numerous affected officers challenged the merger across disparate seniority positions, with 24 years elapsed and multiple promotions/retirements occurring since implementation, weighing against interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case