SHAKEEL AHMAD vs STATE OF J & K . — SLP(C) No. 26384/2010
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010256692010
Filing Date
14-Aug-2010
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 26384/2010
Diary Number
25669/2010
Order Date
14-Dec-2012
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAKEEL AHMAD
Adv. GAURAV AGRAWAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF J & K .
Adv. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Dec-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2012
ROPView PDF
-
27-Apr-2012
ROPView PDF
-
12-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2010
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 26384/2010
-
09-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary of SLP(C) No. 26384/2010 – Shakeel Ahmad v. State of J&K On 14/12/2012, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 26384/2010 alongside related petitions SLP(C) Nos. 7954-7955/2008. The petitioner's counsel sought deletion of respondents 6-9 from the array of parties, which the Court granted at the petitioner's risk, with a direction that no relief could be sought on documents filed by those respondents. The Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts