M/S. TAPI PRESTRESSED PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THROUGH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 8996/2013

Case under Others : Matters Not Falling Under Any Other Category. Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010254332010

Filing Date

12-Aug-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 8996/2013

Diary Number

25433/2010

Order Date

19-Jul-2024

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Partly Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Others : Matters not falling under any other category. Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. TAPI PRESTRESSED PRODUCTS LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR

    Adv. S. S. NEHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THROUGH SECRETARY

    Adv. ASHIESH KUMAR SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jul-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale

  3. 29-Feb-2024

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  4. 23-Nov-2023

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  5. 09-Nov-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  6. 08-Nov-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  7. 21-Sep-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  8. 20-Sep-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  9. 31-Aug-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  10. 23-Aug-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  11. 16-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 13-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 08-Aug-2011

    ROPView PDF

  15. 13-Jul-2011

    ROPView PDF

  16. 18-Apr-2011

    ROPView PDF

  17. 08-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 16-Mar-2011

    ROPView PDF

  19. 09-Feb-2011

    ROPView PDF

  20. 07-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 05-Jan-2011

    ROPView PDF

  22. 10-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 06-Dec-2010

    ROPView PDF

  24. 15-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  25. 11-Nov-2010

    ROPView PDF

  26. 28-Sep-2010

    ROPView PDF

  27. 30-Aug-2010

    ROPView PDF

  28. 12-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8996/2013

  29. 10-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 26-Jul-2010

    ROPView PDF

  31. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 08-Jul-2010

    ROPView PDF

  33. 14-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. [ 2024 INSC 539 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

Common Record of Proceedings — heard with connected matters

Lead case: C.A. No. 8985/2013

PDF 1PDF 2PDF 3PDF 4PDF 5PDF 6PDF 7PDF 8PDF 9
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 008996/2013 Supreme Court partially allowed appeals by BOT scheme concessionaires challenging stamp duty demands. Court upheld that BOT concession agreements constitute "leases" under Stamp Act, but limited stamp duty to 2% of amount spent by lessee only—not entire project cost. Directions issued for recalculation and refund of excess amounts paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case