M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAM vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM — C.A. No. 8580 - 8582/2011
Case under Direct Taxation : Income Tax Act, 1961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Gift Tax Act, 1958, Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, Business Profit Tax Act, 1947 [Other Than Matters Covered by Categories 1602-1605] Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010253892010
Filing Date
12-Aug-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 8580 - 8582/2011
Diary Number
25389/2010
Order Date
23-Jan-2024
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2024 INSC 53
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAM
Adv. LIZ MATHEW (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM
Adv. B. V. BALARAM DAS (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Jan-2024
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2024
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2024
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
14-Sep-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
13-Sep-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
31-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
24-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
23-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
17-Aug-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
16-Aug-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
26-Jul-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
20-Jul-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
19-Jul-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan
-
20-Apr-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2014
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2014
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2013
ROPView PDF
-
26-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
12-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
07-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
10-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Sep-2010
ROPView PDF
-
20-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8580 - 8582/2011
-
[ 2024 INSC 53 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Summary: M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Court Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the assessee's appeals and set aside the High Court's order, restoring the Tribunal's decision that the reassessment proceedings were barred by limitation and lacked proper legal basis. Key Facts: Mangalam Publications, a publishing firm, had books of account seized by the Income Tax Department in a 1985 search. The assessee subsequently filed income tax returns for assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92, and 1992-93 without regular balance sheets (due to the seized materials). The department later obtained a balance sheet submitted to a bank for credit purposes and, comparing it to a 1993-94 balance sheet, concluded income had escaped assessment and issued reassessment notices over eight years later. Core Ruling: The Court held that reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act cannot be based on a "change of opinion" or subjective reanalysis of the same facts. The assessing officer relied on a balance sheet previously declared unreliable by the CIT(A) itself, creating no new material evidence. Since the assessee had disclosed all primary facts required during original assessment (despite lacking books), and made no false declarations, the reopening constituted an impermissible change of opinion rather than basis reassessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts