V. JANARDHAN vs KHAJA GHOUSIA (DEAD) BY LRS. . — C.A. No. 1694/2008

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010253462006

Filing Date

30-Sep-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 1694/2008

Diary Number

25346/2006

Order Date

25-May-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V. JANARDHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHAJA GHOUSIA (DEAD) BY LRS. .

    Adv. D. BHARATHI REDDY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 21-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 28-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 29-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 15-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 01-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 15-Jan-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 19-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 30-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 27-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 23-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 04-Jun-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-May-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 24-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 27-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Sep-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1694/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 1694/2008 - V. Janardhan v. Khaja Ghousia The Supreme Court allowed V. Janardhan's appeal on 25 May 2011, setting aside the High Court's judgment dated 19 July 2006. The Court found that the High Court had decided the Second Appeal without framing any substantial question of law, violating Section 100 CPC. The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law, with a request to dispose of it within four months. No observations were made on merits, and no costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case