S.H.BAIG vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH — C.A. No. 9888 - 9899/2018

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010251132011

Filing Date

10-Aug-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 9888 - 9899/2018

Diary Number

25113/2011

Order Date

25-Sep-2018

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2018 INSC 872

Disposal Type

Leave Granted & Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.H.BAIG

    Adv. PANKAJ GUPTA S. K. VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

    Adv. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-2] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-3] SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-4]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Sep-2018

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 25-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  5. 13-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 13-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  7. 06-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  9. 05-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 05-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  11. 17-Apr-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  12. 10-Apr-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  13. 03-Apr-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  14. 09-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Feb-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  16. 02-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 11-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 11-May-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 27-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 27-Mar-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 27-Mar-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 23-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 23-Feb-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 10-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 12-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 12-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 12-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 12-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 12-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 12-Feb-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 12-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 08-Sep-2015

    ROPView PDF

  33. 08-Sep-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  34. 08-Sep-2015

    ROPView PDF

  35. 28-Aug-2015

    ROPView PDF

  36. 28-Aug-2015

    ROPView PDF

  37. 25-Aug-2015

    ROPView PDF

  38. 10-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 10-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 26-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  41. 26-Mar-2015

    ROPView PDF

  42. 11-Feb-2015

    ROPView PDF

  43. 11-Feb-2015

    ROPView PDF

  44. 11-Feb-2015

    ROPView PDF

  45. 15-Jan-2015

    ROPView PDF

  46. 15-Jan-2015

    ROPView PDF

  47. 09-Dec-2014

    ROPView PDF

  48. 25-Nov-2014

    ROPView PDF

  49. 25-Nov-2014

    ROPView PDF

  50. 10-Nov-2014

    ROPView PDF

  51. 10-Nov-2014

    ROPView PDF

  52. 08-Sep-2014

    ROPView PDF

  53. 08-Sep-2014

    ROPView PDF

  54. 28-Aug-2014

    ROPView PDF

  55. 28-Aug-2014

    ROPView PDF

  56. 07-May-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  57. 07-May-2014

    ROPView PDF

  58. 06-May-2014

    ROPView PDF

  59. 07-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 04-Apr-2014

    Office ReportView PDF

  61. 04-Apr-2014

    ROPView PDF

  62. 06-Mar-2014

    ROPView PDF

  63. 03-Feb-2014

    ROPView PDF

  64. 18-Nov-2013

    ROPView PDF

  65. 12-Nov-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  66. 24-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  67. 26-Aug-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  68. 26-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  69. 30-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  70. 22-Apr-2013

    ROPView PDF

  71. 16-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  72. 12-Apr-2013

    ROPView PDF

  73. 19-Mar-2013

    ROPView PDF

  74. 15-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  75. 14-Mar-2013

    ROPView PDF

  76. 19-Feb-2013

    ROPView PDF

  77. 11-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  78. 06-Feb-2013

    ROPView PDF

  79. 29-Jan-2013

    ROPView PDF

  80. 09-Jan-2013

    ROPView PDF

  81. 03-Dec-2012

    ROPView PDF

  82. 30-Nov-2012

    ROPView PDF

  83. 19-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  84. 04-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  85. 01-Oct-2012

    ROPView PDF

  86. 27-Sep-2012

    ROPView PDF

  87. 31-Aug-2012

    ROPView PDF

  88. 24-Aug-2012

    ROPView PDF

  89. 23-Aug-2012

    ROPView PDF

  90. 12-Jul-2012

    ROPView PDF

  91. 03-Jul-2012

    ROPView PDF

  92. 30-Apr-2012

    ROPView PDF

  93. 23-Apr-2012

    ROPView PDF

  94. 16-Mar-2012

    ROPView PDF

  95. 16-Mar-2012

    ROPView PDF

  96. 30-Jan-2012

    ROPView PDF

  97. 05-Jan-2012

    ROPView PDF

  98. 12-Dec-2011

    ROPView PDF

  99. 17-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  100. 01-Nov-2011

    ROPView PDF

  101. 17-Oct-2011

    ROPView PDF

  102. 10-Aug-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9888 - 9899/2018

  103. [ 2018 INSC 872 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by ministerial employees of Madhya Pradesh Police seeking pay parity with executive police officers. The Court held that ministerial staff are not entitled to equal pay scales despite being given police ranks in 1967, as they have different recruitment processes, qualifications, and duties than executive employees. The 1983 Pay Rules explicitly excluded ministerial staff from benefits granted to executive officers, and the Chaudhary Commission had recommended against pay parity. The Court affirmed recovery of excess amounts paid between January 2000 and November 2001. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case