THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT vs M/S. CERA BOARD AND DOORS, KANNUR, KERALA — C.A. No. 7240 - 7248/2009
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010249602009
Filing Date
21-Aug-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 7240 - 7248/2009
Diary Number
24960/2009
Order Date
19-Aug-2020
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2020 INSC 495
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, CALICUT
Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. CERA BOARD AND DOORS, KANNUR, KERALA
Adv. M. P. DEVANATH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Aug-2020
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
30-Jul-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2020
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.S. Bopanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
05-Mar-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Mar-2020
IA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
19-Feb-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
05-Oct-2016
Office ReportView PDF
-
05-Oct-2016
ROPView PDF
-
03-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
03-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
22-Apr-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2011
ROPView PDF
-
05-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Apr-2010
ROPView PDF
-
25-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
21-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7240 - 7248/2009
Summary The Supreme Court of India upheld CESTAT's decisions remanding seven batches of excise duty evasion cases involving plywood manufacturers for re-adjudication. The court found that both adjudicating authorities and CESTAT, while correctly identifying undervaluation and duty evasion, failed to properly apply Section 4 valuation methods. The court clarified that for pre-01.07.2000 sales, "normal price" under Section 4(1)(a) applies to wholesale trade transactions, while post-01.07.2000 sales require "transaction value" assessment. Cases not meeting these statutory conditions must be valued under the applicable Valuation Rules, not through arbitrary estimation across all transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts