WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD. vs DY.COMMR.,KARWAR . — C.A. No. 7453/2012

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010246792008

Filing Date

27-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 7453/2012

Diary Number

24679/2008

Order Date

10-Oct-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD.

    Adv. AP & J CHAMBERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DY.COMMR.,KARWAR .

    Adv. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 30-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 22-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 19-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 27-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7453/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. Dy. Commr., Karwar Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court Division Bench's dismissal order and remitted the matter back to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits. The Court found that the Division Bench had improperly focused only on procedural Rule 17 of Karnataka Government Rules without adequately addressing West Coast Paper Mills' substantive claims regarding revenue record corrections and forest department communications. Next Steps: The Division Bench of the High Court was directed to restore Writ Appeal No. 3466/2005 and dispose of it expeditiously after considering the appellant's claims and the supporting communications from forest authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case