THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU vs G. KUMAR — SLP(C) No. 15615/2023
Case under Service Laws : Regularization, Contract Employees, Ad-hoc Employees, Daily Wage Employees Section XII. Status: Pending.
CNR: SCIN010245802023
Filing Date
19-Jun-2023
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 15615/2023
Diary Number
24580/2023
Order Date
17-Apr-2026
Document Type
ROP
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Adv. T. HARISH KUMAR[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.G. KUMAR
Adv. ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-1] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-2] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-3] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-4] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-5] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-7] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-8] ANAND DILIP LANDGE[R-9]
Case History
-
02-Feb-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
-
29-Jan-2026
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2025
Mention Memo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi
-
18-Jul-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Feb-2025
Not Taken Up
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
29-Jan-2025
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
05-Dec-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Dec-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court)
-
05-Dec-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (Court)
-
30-Oct-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Oct-2023
Ordinary
Registrar (Court)
-
18-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. SLP(C) No. 15615/2023
Summary: SLP(C) No. 15615/2023 - State of Tamil Nadu v. G. Kumar On 02-02-2026, the Supreme Court heard multiple consolidated Special Leave Petitions arising from a High Court judgment dated 30-08-2022. The Court issued notices on applications for condonation of delay, setting aside abatement, and substitution of legal representatives following the death of respondents. The petitioner was directed to furnish details of legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 6 and file appropriate substitution applications within two weeks. Meanwhile, parties were permitted to complete their pleadings, with the matter listed for hearing after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts