KEWALANAND B.ED.COLLEGE vs STATE OF U.P. THR. COLLECTOR — C.A. No. 8257/2013

Case under Land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Abolition of Zamindari/jagirs/inams/estates, Land Reform Legislations, Agricultural Tenancy, Including Prohibition of Transfer of Land Belonging to Sc/st Section III-A. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010245432010

Filing Date

05-Aug-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 8257/2013

Diary Number

24543/2010

Order Date

12-Jul-2016

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Abolition of zamindari/jagirs/inams/estates, land reform legislations, agricultural tenancy, including prohibition of transfer of land belonging to SC/ST Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KEWALANAND B.ED.COLLEGE

    Adv. ATISHI DIPANKAR[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. THR. COLLECTOR

    Adv. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1] TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-2] TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-3] DEEPAK GOEL[R-4]

Case History

  1. 11-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  2. 11-May-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi

  3. 11-May-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi

  4. 12-Jul-2016
  5. 12-Jul-2016
  6. 09-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 02-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 23-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 30-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 02-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 19-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8257/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 12/07/2016, Civil Appeal No. 8259/2013 filed by Kewalanand B.Ed. College against the State of U.P. was heard before the Registrar. Service was complete and all four respondents were duly represented. The Court directed the Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per Supreme Court Rules, noting that the statement of case is no longer mandatory after the 2013 amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case