RAHUL vs APPOLLO TYRES LTD — Crl.A. No. 2207/2014

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010244512008

Filing Date

25-Aug-2008

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 2207/2014

Diary Number

24451/2008

Order Date

25-Sep-2018

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL

    Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APPOLLO TYRES LTD

    Adv. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI[R-2] CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI[R-3] CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI[R-4] AVINASH KR. LAKHANPAL[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Sep-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 25-Sep-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  4. 19-Mar-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Mar-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  6. 16-Feb-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2018

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  8. 17-Jan-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 17-Jan-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  10. 11-Dec-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Dec-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  12. 10-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 10-Nov-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  14. 04-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-Sep-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  16. 21-Jul-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 21-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 01-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 01-May-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Oct-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 08-Oct-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 08-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 26-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 26-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 04-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 09-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 25-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 17-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 17-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 21-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 27-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 09-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 20-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 05-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 29-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 09-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 06-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 09-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 02-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 04-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 02-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 06-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 12-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 09-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 01-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 15-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 25-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 2207/2014

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court allowed Rahul's criminal appeal on September 25, 2018, setting aside the High Court's order directing continuation of trial against the appellants (transporters). The Court held that since the banker-accused (respondents 2-4) were exonerated and this exoneration remained unchallenged, prosecution against the transporters would serve no useful purpose and constitute a sham prosecution, as actual liability rested with the banker. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case