NTPC LIMITED THROUGH ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (LAW) vs CENTRAL ELECT. REGULATORY. COMMISSION AND ORS — C.A. No. 7107 - 7114/2010

Case under Section XVII. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010240642010

Filing Date

02-Aug-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 7107 - 7114/2010

Diary Number

24064/2010

Order Date

31-Aug-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NTPC LIMITED THROUGH ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (LAW)

    Adv. SAKIE JAKHARIA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL ELECT. REGULATORY. COMMISSION AND ORS

    Adv. PRADEEP MISRA[R-25] D.KUMANAN[R-7] [Gr] RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-26] RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-30] S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-17]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 31-Aug-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti

  4. 24-Aug-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  5. 23-Aug-2023

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  6. 17-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 02-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7107 - 7114/2010

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed NTPC Limited's appeals challenging CERC's 1997-2001 tariff determination, affirming the Appellate Tribunal's decision that no prejudice was caused despite CERC's alleged non-compliance with Regulation 59 procedures. The Court left the interpretative question regarding Regulation 59's mandatory nature open for determination in an appropriate future case, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case