STATE OF RAJASTHAN . vs BHOJRAJ — C.A. No. 8542/2010

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010239522008

Filing Date

21-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 8542/2010

Diary Number

23952/2008

Order Date

01-Oct-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN .

    Adv. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHOJRAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 09-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 20-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 28-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 23-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 13-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 28-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 11-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 31-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 15-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 21-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 02-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 25-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 12-Jan-2009
  20. 12-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 28-Nov-2008
  22. 17-Nov-2008
  23. 24-Oct-2008
  24. 20-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 21-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 8542/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Civil Appeal No. 8542 of 2010 On October 1, 2010, the Supreme Court disposed of appeals by the State of Rajasthan challenging a High Court order directing implementation of the Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camps Rules, 1972. The Court directed the State to immediately implement the first and third directions (conducting a survey of eligible prisoners and holding Advisory Committee meetings twice yearly), while allowing the second direction (establishing camps at each district headquarters) to be implemented progressively and in phases subject to resource availability. The Court noted that ten camps were already functioning and directed the State to consider transferring the lead respondent to an existing camp before his sentence ended in March 2011. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case