AITHAPPA NAIKA . vs K. DAMODARA NAYAK @ K. LAKSHMANA NAYAK REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KANANTHA NAYAK — C.A. No. 60/2009
Case under Section XI-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010238992006
Filing Date
18-Sep-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 60/2009
Diary Number
23899/2006
Order Date
03-Aug-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AITHAPPA NAIKA .
Adv. S. N. BHAT (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.K. DAMODARA NAYAK @ K. LAKSHMANA NAYAK REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KANANTHA NAYAK
Adv. SHIBU DEVASIA OLICKAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
20-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
09-Sep-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
08-Jul-2015
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Dec-2006
ROPView PDF
-
13-Oct-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 60/2009
Case Summary: CA No. 60/2009 Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and disposed of both civil appeals (CA 60/2009 and CA 61/2009) on August 3, 2017. The original decree required appellants Aithappa Naika to deliver possession and pay mesne profits (~Rs. 75,000) to respondent K. Damodara Nayak, but possession was already transferred; the Court exempted the appellants from paying mesne profits based on the peculiar circumstances, including their scheduled tribe status and the respondent's 10-year non-appearance suggesting lack of genuine interest in recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts