THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY vs RAM DAYAL — C.A. No. 2938/2012
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010238672007
Filing Date
17-Aug-2007
Registration No
C.A. No. 2938/2012
Diary Number
23867/2007
Order Date
06-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Adv. RACHNA GUPTA[P-1] RACHNA GUPTA[P-2]
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAM DAYAL
Adv. MANOJ K. MISHRA YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-2] MANOJ K. MISHRA[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2018
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
27-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
-
26-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2007
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 2938/2012
Case Summary: C.A. No. 002938/2012 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ram Dayal On February 6, 2018, the Supreme Court dismissed Uttar Pradesh's civil appeal challenging the High Court's decision to set aside a mining lease advertisement dated December 24, 2005. The Court found no grounds for interference given the passage of time and the High Court's order. The state was permitted to issue a fresh mining lease advertisement if deemed appropriate, in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts