SUDAM KISAN GAVANE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. vs MANIK ANANTA SHIKKETOD(D) BY LRS.. — C.A. No. 5272/2010
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010235432009
Filing Date
10-Aug-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 5272/2010
Diary Number
23543/2009
Order Date
29-Aug-2019
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2019 INSC 977
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUDAM KISAN GAVANE (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.
Adv. B. SRIDHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANIK ANANTA SHIKKETOD(D) BY LRS..
Adv. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Aug-2019
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
28-Aug-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
23-Apr-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Sep-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2016
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5272/2010
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the High Court, finding procedural error in the High Court's handling of the second appeal. The Court held that the High Court violated Section 100 CPC by failing to formulate substantial questions of law before hearing arguments; instead, it formulated questions only in the judgment, denying parties fair opportunity to address them. The High Court was directed to reframe questions after hearing parties and decide the appeal afresh with priority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts