UNION OF INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER vs M/S ADITYA CEMENT (A UNIT OF GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. ) — C.A. No. 6736/2008
Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010234872006
Filing Date
13-Sep-2006
Registration No
C.A. No. 6736/2008
Diary Number
23487/2006
Order Date
12-Oct-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER
Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S ADITYA CEMENT (A UNIT OF GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. )
Adv. M. P. DEVANATH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Oct-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
05-Oct-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
20-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
14-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
13-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Dec-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Nov-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Sep-2006
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6736/2008
Summary: The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against M/S Aditya Cement on October 12, 2017, citing the small revenue amount involved (approximately Rs. 8 lakhs) and Central Government Instructions dated 17.12.2015 imposing a Rs. 25 lakhs ceiling for Supreme Court appeals. The dismissal was made keeping all questions of law open, and all pending applications were disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts