ARVIND KUMAR ETC.ETC. vs STATE OF BIHAR . — C.A. No. 1240 - 1241/2011
Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010234832009
Filing Date
10-Aug-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 1240 - 1241/2011
Diary Number
23483/2009
Order Date
28-Nov-2011
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVIND KUMAR ETC.ETC.
Adv. AMIT PAWAN ATULESH KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH VIPIN KUMAR JAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR .
Adv. VIVEK SINGH BRAJESH KUMAR RAVI KUMAR TOMAR SAMIR ALI KHAN JITENDRA KUMAR SUSMITA LAL NIKHIL NAYYAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated) DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) PREM SUNDER JHA GOPAL SINGH T. MAHIPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2011
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Feb-2010
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1240 - 1241/2011
Summary: C.A. No. 1240-1241/2011 (Arvind Kumar v. State of Bihar) On 28 November 2011, the Supreme Court disposed of multiple interlocutory applications relating to recruitment of Sub Inspectors of Police in Bihar. The Court allowed applications for exemption from official translation, impleadment, and withdrawal of a respondent. Significantly, the Court expanded eligibility for the examination: whereas a prior February 2011 order had limited participation to 223 writ petitioners, this order permitted all similarly situated applicants and eligible candidates to appear for the 299 Sub Inspector posts under uniform standards and identical physical and written examinations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts