V.M. MANOMANI vs SHANTHI — C.A. No. 5996/2009

Case under Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010233712005

Filing Date

24-Oct-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 5996/2009

Diary Number

23371/2005

Order Date

27-Nov-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Neutral Citation

2017 INSC 1144

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.M. MANOMANI

    Adv. ROMY CHACKO (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANTHI

    Adv. BHARAT SANGAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Nov-2017

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 22-Nov-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 22-Nov-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy

  6. 18-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 24-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 09-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 19-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 22-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 14-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 16-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 14-Nov-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 24-Oct-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5996/2009

  22. [ 2017 INSC 1144 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

The Supreme Court disposed of Civil Appeal No. 5996/2009 on November 27, 2017, after the parties settled their dispute out of court. The suit property was transferred to Mr. Maurice Rosario Menezes, who was added as a respondent and sought disposal of the appeal. The court allowed the intervention application and disposed of the appeal, finding nothing survives following the settlement, with no orders as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case